Nikon is better than Canon…

Date April 28, 2008

At least when it comes to lens caps. Now, this is just my opinion, but I shall overwhelm you with photographic evidence that this is the case, and then we shall all be in agreement.

First of all, a Canon lens cap:
Canon Lens Cap

By all appearances, this is a perfectly adequate lens cap. It fits on the end of a lens, thus capping it. It helps keep speckly dust monsters off the lens elements, and can potentially help prevent minor bumps and bruises. I find it especially helpful when I’m in really quiet settings like churches, or weddings, or rock concerts, and I need to know if my lens will autofocus quietly. I just look down at the lens cap, see the word “Ultrasonic,” and know that I can autofocus in near-silent bliss. All around, these lens caps by Canon are fine. And, you’ll please note the two tabs on either side, which push in, for attachment.

But.

There comes a time in every photographer’s life when he, or she, decides to experiment with “lens hoods.” For some people, these mostly plastic devices (which attach to the end of a lens) are used to prevent “lens flare” which can be quite distracting. For others, it is used to add size and weight (and by this term I mean significance, not mass) to lenses. Some of us use them to distinguish ourselves from the average shutterbug. “Oooh, look at me, I have a lens hood. I am a REAL.PHOTOGRAPHER ™. No, I am not compensating for anything!”

And herein lies the problem.

With the lens hood attached, sometimes it become a little difficult to remove or replace the lens cap, precisely due to the placement of the push tabs on the outer rim of the lens cap.

Now, on a lens like my 17-40mm f/4 L, this isn’t that much of an issue. That’s largely due to the fact that the lens hood is shaped like a pizza…wide and flat.

17-40 with Hood Attached

But, the lens hood on my 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS is shaped more like a cup, a long, narrow cup. I had the same shaped hood on my 24-70mm f/2.8 L…a long, deep lens hood with no room to get at the tabs on the lens cap.

70-200 with Hood Attached

You may not be able to tell from this particular photo, but the lens hood is roughly 4 inches deep. With my, shall we say, un-skinny hands, it’s not very easy to get the lens cap on or off without removing the hood, which is a pain.

So, why doesn’t Canon take some notes from Nikon on this? I mean, check out the lens caps for most Nikon lenses.


(Thanks to flickrer the_defiance for allowing the use of this image).

It’s genius! Pinch tabs in the middle of the lens cap! You can reach down into a lens hood and extract or replace the lens cap with ease. This isn’t rocket surgery, Canon. Perhaps you can roll out a new and more awesomer lens cap when you roll out the mythical 5D MkII! In fact, may I be so bold as to request that you engineer and fabricate and make standard issue this new lens cap on the soon-to-be-released Canon 5D MkII and the new 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS kit combination that I just KNOW you have to be working on.

Come on, Canon. Let’s make this happen. Lens caps should be a joy to use, even for chubby-digited folk like myself.

No Responses to “Nikon is better than Canon…”

  1. David duChemin said:

    you said it, GKB. In fact, why is there not a great after-market lens cap? Pinch tabs in the middle, and made of rubber instead of the goofy/cracky-breaky/hurty-in-pocket plastic junk?

    The masses demand change!

  2. GKB said:

    David,
    Don’t you have the inside track at ThinkTank? This seems like something right up their alley, if, that is, they wanted to branch out from bags and so on.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>